BPSNew Ways of Working for Applied Psychologists

 


 

Introduction

The applied psychologies include clinical, counselling, health, forensic, educational and child, occupational, sport and exercise psychology and neuropsychology. In order to become a chartered member of the British Psychological Society (BPS), psychologists must first have completed an undergraduate degree in psychology (or equivalent), which entitles them to register as a graduate. Following this first degree, most psychology graduates gain some additional work experience before going on to register for a three-year programme of work and academic experience that leads to chartered membership. Some of these three-year programmes lead to a doctorate-level qualification, and most psychologists are in the process of moving to this level of academic award. All programmes require a mix of work and academic inputs and assessment to ensure the applied psychologists develop the appropriate competences.  Finally, to qualify in neuropsychology, one must first be chartered as a clinical or educational psychologist, and must then complete a further programme of academic and work experience. This allows individuals to qualify for practitioner membership of the Division of Neuropsychology.

 


 

Aims and objectives

The New Ways of Working for Applied Psychologists sub-group was established in

July 2005 and has met every two months up to the launch conference in Leicester in July 2007 when the group had completed its work. The group was jointly chaired by

Roslyn Hope (NIMHE, NWP) and Professor Tony Lavender (BPS) and included

representatives of carers and users, from the divisions of applied psychology and other professions, including psychiatry, nursing and the allied health professions. Two

stakeholder conferences were held in Wolverhampton and Edinburgh. The group has addressed the following seven objectives:

  • reviewed the pre-qualification roles of psychology graduates, including Primary Care Mental Health Workers (PCMHWs), and recommend how they could be developed to contribute to the sustainable delivery of psychological services;
  • reviewed the current training models for applied psychologists, develop and assess alternative models and make recommendations for the future;
  • mapped the current workforce, identify emerging good practice in new ways of working and develop role descriptions for all levels across the career framework and produce guidance for National Assessors;
  • identified the best models for organising psychological services within Trusts and review the leadership development needs of applied psychologists;
  • identified the best ways that applied psychologists can contribute to the development and work of multidisciplinary teams;
  • identified the way that applied psychologists can improve user access to psychological therapies; and
  • clarified the role, training needs and registration requirements of applied psychologists in implementing the new mental health legislation.  Delays to the implementation meant this was not completed by July 2007.

 

Progress report

Seven project groups were established to meet each of these objectives, and a summary of the work is included below.

 

New pre-qualification roles:

The group reviewed recent developments in graduate roles (including

the PCMHWs). The major lessons were that unless i) these roles fit in with clear

career frameworks, and ii) are coherent with local service developments, they will

not be sustainable. The group developed a career framework for pre-applied

psychology doctorate training that involved the creation of three new levels of

worker, which would enhance access to psychological services across specialties.

An education framework that built on previous work about new roles was

developed to improve the competence of those staff.

 

Training models:

A review of the training models of applied psychologists (i.e. the current divisions

of clinical, counselling, educational and child, forensic, health, occupational,

sport and exercise psychology and neuropsychology) was undertaken.

Alternative models that enhance the unification of those models and

encouraged the adoption of new and flexible roles were developed.

A preferred way forward was identified and a consultation process developed.

This will be a long- term exercise and will require further strategic analysis and

planning by the BPS about the future of the divisions of applied psychology.

 

Career pathways:

The current applied psychology workforce was mapped and examples of

good practice in new ways of working across the country developed.

These examples can be used to provide practising applied psychologists with ideas

for developing innovative practice in their local contexts. Throughout the career

framework, those roles at the different levels that integrate innovative practice

were identified. Finally, the role of the National Assessors has been reviewed

and new guidance produced relevant to all applied psychologists.

 

Organising, leading and managing psychological services:

The current organisation of psychological services has been reviewed, and key

guiding principles for organising psychological services have been identified. The

need for the development within Trusts of Board-level leads in psychological

therapies/services has been emphasised. A variety of models of leadership have

been reviewed, and a model likely to suit applied psychologists and psychological

services has been presented. The leadership roles and training needs of applied

psychologists throughout their careers have been reviewed. Ways in which the

leadership-development needs of applied psychologists can be met have been

identified.

 

Team working:

The theoretical and research literature about effective team working has

been reviewed. Recommendations have been made about the role of applied

psychologists in such key issues as the separation/integration of psychologists in

teams, leadership, and the involvement of psychologists in service improvement.

The role of applied psychologists working effectively within and for teams is

strongly endorsed. Good practice in a number of strategically important services,

such as assertive outreach, crisis resolution and acute care teams, have been

identified throughout the UK. These should act as examples of how applied

psychologists and others can improve the effectiveness of their work for and

within teams.

 

Improving Access to Psychological Therapies:

The project group has actively liaised with the DH and CSIP programme

on Improving Access to Psychological Therapies (IAPT) and in particular the

Workforce Group. Issues that have been identified and addressed include defining

competences for psychological therapies and CBT in particular, surveying the

post-registration training in psychological therapy, developing and defining a

Career Framework for Psychological Therapists, and estimating the workforce and

training requirements for implementing the phased roll-out of the IAPT

programme.

 

Mental health legislation:

A small project group has liaised closely with the existing BPS and DH groups

addressing the reforms to the Mental Health Act and the Mental Capacity Act.

There have been discussions on how to take things forward with the Mental

Health Act reform. In particular, there has been identification of the competences

required in the roles of Approved Mental Health Professional and Responsible

Clinician, the training needs (including probable curricula) and the regulation

and registration mechanisms. Finally, strong links have been established with

the Royal College of Psychiatrists on issues of implementation. The work of this project will continue as legislation was not passed in time for the group to complete the work by the end of July.

 


 

Contact details for chairs of the NWW for Applied Psychologists:

Professor Tony Lavender at tony.lavender@cantebury.ac.uk,

Roslyn Hope at roslyn.hope@csip.org.uk,

 

Back to top.